What a pathetic excuse for a scientific institution they have become.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Bob G on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Bob G on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Tony Heller on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Scissor on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Scissor on Diversity Is Our Strength
- conrad ziefle on Diversity Is Our Strength
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Crashex on 60 Years Of Progress in London
As an aside,
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png
Looks like the 5 day average has swung it down as I said it would. Also the new monthly update is out here.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
“extent on this date tied for the lowest winter maximum extent in the satellite record. Air temperatures over most of the Arctic Ocean were above normal. New data on ice age shows that the amount of older, thicker ice has increased slightly over last year.”
So ice is getting thicker though less extent. You might want to comment on their findings Steve, your Arctic posts are always good reading, even if I don’t agree with some of them 🙂
Andy
They certainly are. Not as good as NSIDC.
Now, talking about NSIDC ….. :p
Andy
What on earth have plankton to with Space Flight?
Hi Paul H,
What on earth have plankton to do with Space Flight?
Nothing, except that there may well be some in the oceans below the ice on europa!
Just a thought.
It’s called NAS-Administration. No mention of “Scientific”.
Being in Virginia Beach they can stop by Edgar Cayce’s A R E foundation for pointers about predictions! Big Jim could use some help!
Linky:
http://www.edgarcayce.org/
Mike,
Was this Edgar Cayce for real? Has he or anyone else provided hard evidence of spirit communication?
Andy
Yes he was a real person and his story is an interesting read. I actually think he was and still is more reputable than all the Climatologists put together.
Some believe what they read about him however history revision to create a myth is a real world issue.
Just as there is no HARD Evidence for AGW there is no Hard Evidence for Spiritual Communication but the later has been studied and practiced much longer than the former. Spiritual Communication goes back to the Burning Bush! Climatology is a flash in the pan fad in comparison.
Since it’s such a profound topic, you would think that there would be more legitimate scientific study regarding the possible existence of spirits/afterlife (I’m being serious).
Some credible people have some very believable stories. It would give climate scientists something more plausible to research!