What a pathetic excuse for a scientific institution they have become.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- conrad ziefle on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- scott allen on Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- conrad ziefle on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Francis Barnett on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Francis Barnett on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
As an aside,
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png
Looks like the 5 day average has swung it down as I said it would. Also the new monthly update is out here.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
“extent on this date tied for the lowest winter maximum extent in the satellite record. Air temperatures over most of the Arctic Ocean were above normal. New data on ice age shows that the amount of older, thicker ice has increased slightly over last year.”
So ice is getting thicker though less extent. You might want to comment on their findings Steve, your Arctic posts are always good reading, even if I don’t agree with some of them 🙂
Andy
They certainly are. Not as good as NSIDC.
Now, talking about NSIDC ….. :p
Andy
What on earth have plankton to with Space Flight?
Hi Paul H,
What on earth have plankton to do with Space Flight?
Nothing, except that there may well be some in the oceans below the ice on europa!
Just a thought.
It’s called NAS-Administration. No mention of “Scientific”.
Being in Virginia Beach they can stop by Edgar Cayce’s A R E foundation for pointers about predictions! Big Jim could use some help!
Linky:
http://www.edgarcayce.org/
Mike,
Was this Edgar Cayce for real? Has he or anyone else provided hard evidence of spirit communication?
Andy
Yes he was a real person and his story is an interesting read. I actually think he was and still is more reputable than all the Climatologists put together.
Some believe what they read about him however history revision to create a myth is a real world issue.
Just as there is no HARD Evidence for AGW there is no Hard Evidence for Spiritual Communication but the later has been studied and practiced much longer than the former. Spiritual Communication goes back to the Burning Bush! Climatology is a flash in the pan fad in comparison.
Since it’s such a profound topic, you would think that there would be more legitimate scientific study regarding the possible existence of spirits/afterlife (I’m being serious).
Some credible people have some very believable stories. It would give climate scientists something more plausible to research!