0.0C anomaly. In Fahrenheit that would be approximately 0.0F.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
But in Hansenius, that’s at least 5 degrees…… +5H
lol, it was nice of you to offer the Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion for free!
I used my calculator.
LOL it was very funny!
Andy W would only have asked otherwise.
It was the “approximately” that made it sing.
It was a nice touch! … and saved me hundreds of hours of CPU time to figure it out myself … 😉
Wouldn’t 0°C be 32° F?
Dirk, we’re talking anomaly—— In other words how far it deviates from the mean…… so if it doesn’t deviate in F is doesn’t deviate in C.
ROFLMAO … Sorry Dirk, you just hit a funny bone with me on that one …
La Nina is still in progress in Niño 3.4 so temperatures are going to continue to go into negative anomaly for months.
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.gif
I am in agreement. I think your right. A quick play with the AMSU temperature toy gives me the feeling that we are still going negative.
Steve, I disagree. I went out to the AMSU temperature toy and using AQUA channel 5, we have been below the average almost the entire month (0.40c cooler than 4/23/2010). My prediction would be a -0.16c anomaly (+/- 0.02c). Every channel is showing an average of 0.40c cooler than last year, and approx. 0.15c cooler through almost the entire month thus far. I think the anomaly is going more negative than it is presently (-0.10c). Should be fun to see. 😉