0.0C anomaly. In Fahrenheit that would be approximately 0.0F.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Election Results
- Tommyb on Election Results
- Michael Spencer on Election Results
- Jack the Insider on Election Results
- Caleb Shaw on Election Results
- Caleb Shaw on Election Results
- Mac on Election Results
- Disillusioned on Election Results
- Francis Barnett on Election Results
- Robertvd on Election Results
But in Hansenius, that’s at least 5 degrees…… +5H
lol, it was nice of you to offer the Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion for free!
I used my calculator.
LOL it was very funny!
Andy W would only have asked otherwise.
It was the “approximately” that made it sing.
It was a nice touch! … and saved me hundreds of hours of CPU time to figure it out myself … 😉
Wouldn’t 0°C be 32° F?
Dirk, we’re talking anomaly—— In other words how far it deviates from the mean…… so if it doesn’t deviate in F is doesn’t deviate in C.
ROFLMAO … Sorry Dirk, you just hit a funny bone with me on that one …
La Nina is still in progress in Niño 3.4 so temperatures are going to continue to go into negative anomaly for months.
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.gif
I am in agreement. I think your right. A quick play with the AMSU temperature toy gives me the feeling that we are still going negative.
Steve, I disagree. I went out to the AMSU temperature toy and using AQUA channel 5, we have been below the average almost the entire month (0.40c cooler than 4/23/2010). My prediction would be a -0.16c anomaly (+/- 0.02c). Every channel is showing an average of 0.40c cooler than last year, and approx. 0.15c cooler through almost the entire month thus far. I think the anomaly is going more negative than it is presently (-0.10c). Should be fun to see. 😉