Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
It’s true Steve, ah…….. but then it is the grauniad, a veritable cesspit of f**kwittedness.
Not having read all the comments [good grief what a thought?!?] this one has been recommended a few times……
// TurningTide
9 May 2011 9:02PM
“Within the following two weeks – probably on 16 May – the cabinet will decide whether or not to drop its commitment to prevent runaway climate change.”
This is really hilarious. Does Monbiot honestly imagine the power to “prevent runaway climate change” lies with the British Cabinet?
Recommend? (124) //
Actually, a bit encouraging. GB has been the flag bearer of the Klimate Kult until now.
The last commenter in the Guardian image must be lost. Just this past winter they were forced to import nuclear energy from France because their windmills failed.