Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
- Six Years Of No Conversation
- THE YEAR OF NO WINTER
- Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
Recent Comments
- arn on Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Bob G on Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Bob G on Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- arn on Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- arn on “experts warn”
- Ivan G Wainwright on Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Bob G on CBS News Defines Free Speech
- Bob G on “experts warn”
- conrad ziefle on “experts warn”
- conrad ziefle on End Of Snow Update
“. . . in response to global climate change.” It’s like those telepathically connected trees that can detect global warming even when their local environment hasn’t changed a bit. Frightening when you think about it.
In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.
—Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day (1970)
I think what they’re detecting is the stuff they’re scraping from the botton of the barrel.
In their MODEL they use” a future value (970 parts per million)” of CO2. They really think it’s going to go that way? I bet that they assume all of this CO2 would be from man? NOT a chance in h*ll! On what idiotic basis do they assume such unfounded inanity/?
They probably believe the half-life of CO2 in the atmosphere is 1000 years (a la NASA fabrication) when it’s really about 5 years. Uninformed is as uninformed does.
That was my reaction. First I thought – ah some science. But no – it’s just another worthless model. Where do they get the funding?
Hig, that’s because nothing happened until they hit 970 ppm. They couldn’t show the results they wanted below that.
970 makes more DMS, which makes more clouds.
Phyto is a plant, CO2 is plant food…
They didn’t/couldn’t model more clouds and more phyto……………..
Add another one to the …
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
It is not there yet even with 859 items!
I think that Steve or Anthony should contact them and see about partnering up or something. That list is probably a few hundred shy at this point.