Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
“. . . in response to global climate change.” It’s like those telepathically connected trees that can detect global warming even when their local environment hasn’t changed a bit. Frightening when you think about it.
In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.
—Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day (1970)
I think what they’re detecting is the stuff they’re scraping from the botton of the barrel.
In their MODEL they use” a future value (970 parts per million)” of CO2. They really think it’s going to go that way? I bet that they assume all of this CO2 would be from man? NOT a chance in h*ll! On what idiotic basis do they assume such unfounded inanity/?
They probably believe the half-life of CO2 in the atmosphere is 1000 years (a la NASA fabrication) when it’s really about 5 years. Uninformed is as uninformed does.
That was my reaction. First I thought – ah some science. But no – it’s just another worthless model. Where do they get the funding?
Hig, that’s because nothing happened until they hit 970 ppm. They couldn’t show the results they wanted below that.
970 makes more DMS, which makes more clouds.
Phyto is a plant, CO2 is plant food…
They didn’t/couldn’t model more clouds and more phyto……………..
Add another one to the …
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
It is not there yet even with 859 items!
I think that Steve or Anthony should contact them and see about partnering up or something. That list is probably a few hundred shy at this point.