Greenpeace (aka IPCC) says coal is killing kids. Are they willing to put that to the test?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Posting On X
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- Disillusioned on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- John Francis on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
Lack of coal will kill a lot more children than too much coal.
The way the researchers would probably do it, you stuff a rat with a ton of coal and check its vitals.
They showed that cyclamates and saccharin were bad by stiffing a dry powder mixture of the two sweeteners down rats throats. The rats had problems, mostly ulcers (too dry). The dose was equivalent to 7,000 12 oz bottles of soda a day. Hmmm. You could also try to pour 84,000 oz (1312 gallons) into a rat (or a human) and show that they explode!