Greenpeace (aka IPCC) says coal is killing kids. Are they willing to put that to the test?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on UK Net Zero
- arn on UK Net Zero
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- gordon vigurs on UK Net Zero
- Independent on UK Net Zero
- Francis Barnett on Erasing 1921
- william on UK Net Zero
- Robertvd on Erasing 1921
- dearieme on Erasing 1921
- Tel on President Trump Gets Every Question Right
Lack of coal will kill a lot more children than too much coal.
The way the researchers would probably do it, you stuff a rat with a ton of coal and check its vitals.
They showed that cyclamates and saccharin were bad by stiffing a dry powder mixture of the two sweeteners down rats throats. The rats had problems, mostly ulcers (too dry). The dose was equivalent to 7,000 12 oz bottles of soda a day. Hmmm. You could also try to pour 84,000 oz (1312 gallons) into a rat (or a human) and show that they explode!