Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- GW on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
OT: another gang of proverbial bitch-ass punks bites the proverbial dust: http://bostonherald.com/business/technology/general/view/2011_0815evergreen_solar_files_for_bankruptcy_plans_asset_sale/srvc=home&position=1
Climate Junk Science hasn’t improved much in the past 100 years…
“If the present amount of carbon-dioxide were doubled a mild climate would prevail even at the north, and south poles, and the polar ice caps would probably disappear, and the temperature in other parts of the world would be raised. If, on the other hand, the quantity were reduced by a trifle less than half its present amount, conditions like those of the last great ice age would return.”
~26 May 1906
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/55635180?