Climate scientists are sure that they understand the climate, except for every couple of weeks when they admit that they underestimated the effects of aerosols, solar cycles, Methane, Ozone, clouds, soot, jet contrails, cow farts, ocean currents, ocean salinity ……..
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- arn on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Robertvd on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Louis Hooffstetter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
LOL, I would have said 99.44%, but whatever.
-Scott
You’re just too young …..
You name it and they got it wrong! They do not even understand how a butterfly affects the global climate and there is one flapping its wings in West Africa as we speak.
The only thing alarmists know about flapping has to do with their gums.
When you have to preface every utterance with “climate change is real and caused by humans, it is occurring now, and it is dangerous for mankind” like some zombie mantra it begins to ring hollow pretty quickly.
That statement is a keeper; it would be impossible for any “climate scientist” to rebut it in a rational manner.