Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Thing Of The Past
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
Recent Comments
- Tel on The Thing Of The Past
- GW on The Thing Of The Past
- Disillusioned on The Thing Of The Past
- dm on The Thing Of The Past
- Gamecock on The Thing Of The Past
- Richard E Fritz on The Thing Of The Past
- Disillusioned on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Disillusioned on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Gamecock on “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- roaddog on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
“A paper published last month in the journal Climate Dynamics finds that “The Antarctic sea ice extent (SIE) shows an increased trend during 1979–2009, with a trend rate of 1.36 ± 0.43% per decade. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition analysis shows that the rate of the increased trend has been accelerating in the past decade.”
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2011/08/antarctica-sea-ice-shows-accelerating.html
couldn’t have happened….it was before 1950…
Nope. More like 5.6F from c1902 to c 1943.
This is what real science as opposed to newspaper clippings has to say:
http://forces.si.edu/arctic/pdf/ACT%203_ARCTIC%20HEAT%20WAVE.pdf
Please notice the Global Temperatures for the same period.
Which satellite are you using?
Correction on the above.
“More like 5.6F from c1902 to c 1943.”
The above implies a trend but there is no trend; only a comparison between 2 years. Therefore, my statement above should be corrected to:
“More like 5.6F when the year c1902 is compared to c1943”
For an actual trend between 1900 and 1940; as well as 1900 through the present, see the link below.
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/mean:1/plot/hadcrut3vgl/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1900/to:1940/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1900/to:2011/trend
That WFT link is a global trend. Up to this point the focus of this post has been on Arctic temps.
It’s a shame that some people just can’t seem to grasp the difference between the Arctic and the entire globe. Why it seems like only last week we were being lectured that North America isn’t the globe when it turned out that the weather patterns in North America weren’t going through any unusual disruption. You would almost think it was an elaborate joke if it turned out that the same person also couldn’t distinguish fiction from non-fiction.
J Calvert; I forgot to add this:
http://www.arcus.org/arcss/sass/sass1projects/downloads/4_Rigor_03.06.ppt#282,4,Slide 4
http://www.lanceandeskimo.com/paul/skeletor.ppt