Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Ehrlich 1967 : Tax Baby Food – Or We Will All Starve By 1985
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I have no issue with removing tax deductions for children. 75% of my property taxes goes to the local school district and I have no kids. If anything school taxes should be based on the number of children you have and not the property you own, if we really want to be ‘fair’. My parents paid for my education thru taxation decades ago. Why am I being charged for services not rendered? Why, when I am not burdening the district with more enrollees, should I be forced to pay?
Now I’m troubled. I just agreed with something Ehrlich said.
I may not agree with Ehrlich but I do agree with you! There should be a tax incentive for not having children!
This a-hole wrote a book about population even though he knows nothing about it.
High reproduction rates are inversely tied to prosperity, short term exceptions like the ‘baby boom’ notwithstanding. Over long periods of time the high birth rates, no doubt a function of nature, are found in the least developed countries with the worse average living conditions.
The most prosperous and stable places, like the western world, operate right at replacement levels even falling below. In the mid-1960’s China had 700 million while we had 250 million. Today China has almost 1.4 billion and we have 280+ million (309 million counting illegal aliens). China has almost doubled their population (with the single child rule) while we are not even close to doing that.
When you take this into account, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that Erlich hates the USA, the western world and humanity itself.
This is a sick man, perhaps the sickest one that has a high profile in the media. When he turns into worm-bait the IQ of the human race will improve dramatically.
On a side-note though, removing all tax-deductions on EVERYTHING would be a great step because then everybody would have skin in the game.
“In the mid-1960?s China had 700 million while we had 250 million. Today China has almost 1.4 billion and we have 280+ million (309 million counting illegal aliens). China has almost doubled their population (with the single child rule) while we are not even close to doing that.”
The 1960 Census counted less than 180 million people in the US. 1970 counted over 203 million. 1980 226.5 million. 1990 almost 249 million. 2000 counted less than 281.5 million. 2010 counted less than 309 million. So, the US population actually grew from around 190 million in the mid 60s to almost 309 million currently, a 62% increase.