Global weirding in 1839
It is interesting to know that 100 years ago (1839) the people of the colony were under the opinion each year that the climate was altering, as even to-day (1934) the old inhabitants say the same thing.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
The more that things change …
Calamity change is “change we can believe in” if your Generatio Y (as in Why?).
Was the ship named after Naomi? (I know her last name is really Oreskes, but there seems to be a lot of confusion on the Internet about that. I found a lot of references to “Naomi Orestes.”)
Beat me to it! I was just going to same the same thing.
The difference now is that the current generation of AGW cultists are telling us that *they* are right, and all the previous ones were wrong of course.
Oops that reply was to the wrong one.
Every generation was right.
[ignore duplicate above]
Beat me to it! I was just going to same the same thing.
The difference now is that the current generation of AGW cultists are telling us that *they* are right, and all the previous ones were wrong of course.
Brilliant find Steve, thnx