Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Food And Energy Experts
- “Are We Imagining It?”
- The Suffragettes
- Michael Mann Upset
- A Serious Problem
- Miami Drowning
- No Longer The Greatest Existential Threat
- Almost Unanimous Consensus Of Scientists
- Maryland To Drown
- Rapid Virus Mutation
- Wisconsin To Save The Planet
- Magical Musk
- “Scientists Forecast”
- “thing of the past” update
- Defunding The Climate Scam
- “Record Low Sea Ice”
- Leader Of The Free World
- Measuring The Heat
- Bankrupting The #1 Climate Fraud
- Cyclone Mahina
- “tropical paradise”
- “The tragedy of modern war”
- Manhattan Project Victims
- “Plants losing appetite for carbon dioxide”
- “Overcrowding and piles of rubbish”
Recent Comments
- arn on The Suffragettes
- arn on The Suffragettes
- arn on Food And Energy Experts
- conrad ziefle on The Suffragettes
- Bob G on The Suffragettes
- Bob G on The Suffragettes
- Jack the Insider on A Serious Problem
- Bob G on Miami Drowning
- Tel on No Longer The Greatest Existential Threat
- arn on A Serious Problem
The main difference was probably the difference in accuracy between measuring devices and siting issues.
But once you figure in the heat index, it really wasn’t that cold. I believe it’s called ‘The Hansen Effect’.
In the Winter the heat index probably made it feel like -28 or the scientific term for that would be “Friggen Cold”
It was a cold SOB that day!!
Very much like 1936, very cold winter followed by very hot summer. Catastrophic spring flooding and tornadoes. Sounds a lot like global weirding to me, even with CO2 well under 350 ppm.