what we can say is that this summer is a picture of what it would be like every summer if we made certain choices regarding our energy sources
What total bullshit.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
Sorry, but this girl really needs to grow up.
When I read the statements, articles, and interviews from “climate scientists” it reminds me of alchemists who were trying to change lead into gold.
At least the alchemists did actual experiments ;).
And Johann Friedrich Böttger discovered how to make porcelain while doing so, much to the chagrin of the busted Chinese monopoly on the stuff.
When a scientist says things like :-
I“Who doesn’t want renewable sources of energy? Who doesn’t want cleaner air?”
I have serious doubts about their objectivity.
Especially considering the noises they make if you say “I do. Let’s build more nuclear power stations!”
No, she’s absolutely correct.
Feb 2, 2011 – HOUSTON (Reuters) – Texas imposed statewide rolling blackouts for only the second time in over two decades on Wednesday after frigid weather
Aug 4, 2011 – The electric grid operator in Texas, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), is warning that it may need to begin “rotating power outages” as early as this afternoon to stabilize the electric power grid.
AUSTIN (August 24, 2011)—The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which operates the state’s power grid, issued a power warning Wednesday afternoon and said rolling outages were possible, but later canceled the notice ending the threat of blackouts.
Switching to weather-based energy sources (wind, solar) means less reliable energy, which will lead to more rolling blackouts in the summer.
I suppose you are not familiar with Ms Hayhoe’s claims because she wants more unreliable energy!
“Who doesn’t want renewable sources of energy?” Hayhoe told Yale e360 senior editor Fen Montaigne. “Who doesn’t want cleaner air and a thriving economy? Who doesn’t agree that we should be conservative with what we have? I think this is the way to move forward on this issue.”
=====================================
…..sounds like a drug commercial
For the types of drugs not approved by the FDA!
WOW Man! Did you see that pink elephant flying past the moon last night? It was totally awesome Man! 🙂
LOL…..I was thinking the drug commercials that promise to put hair on your head, fix your blood pressure, and put lead in your pencil…..
..and then list a million side effects that will all kill you
AH HA! You mean the ones that should not have been approved by the FDA!
She’s gone completely off her rails.
I had also posted about her comments on my blog and she took the trouble to respond:
http://reasonabledoubtclimate.wordpress.com/2011/08/26/how-to-talk-to-a-climate-sceptic/#comments