Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Mike Peinsipp on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Robertvd on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Look at this!!!
http://calderup.wordpress.com/2011/08/24/cern-experiment-confirms-cosmic-ray-action/
“Ion-induced nucleation [cosmic ray action] will manifest itself as a steady production of new particles [molecular clusters] that is difficult to isolate in atmospheric observations because of other sources of variability but is nevertheless taking place and could be quite large when averaged globally over the troposphere [the lower atmosphere].”
I have submitted the following comment on the cern experiment at hockeyschtick:
I am afraid that it doesn’t matter that cosmic rays encourage cloud formation. What matters is that clouds do not affect the overall energy distribution (the hydrostatic temperature lapse rate structure in the troposphere), hence the temperature at any given pressure, in the atmosphere:
Venus: No Greenhouse Effect
Simply put, despite the planet-wide thick cloud cover on Venus, despite its much greater albedo than Earth’s, the temperature-vs-pressure curves of Venus and Earth, when their different distances from the Sun are taken into account, are essentially the same. Only the distance from the Sun, nothing else, accounts for the detailed temperatures in the two planets’ atmospheres. The physical reasons for this are given in my analysis at the above site. As I have been trying to tell even the skeptics, the Venus/Earth comparison, properly done for the first time, trumps all of climate theory (consensus or skeptic), and demolishes it. This overwhelming and definitive evidence of two detailed planetary atmospheres is the necessary starting point now for the correction of, and real progress in, climate science. Everyone on every side of the climate debates needs to learn and understand this critical point.
…and here’s one we prepared earlier.