‘
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
Recent Comments
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- dm on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on 70C At Lisbon
- John Francis on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- John Francis on Perfect Correlation
- oeman50 on 70C At Lisbon
- Gordon Vigurs on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
When that article came out in June 1988, there was a bad drought in progress over much of the US that resulted in a major (over 20%) reduction of the corn crop. There has been nowhere near such a reduction in the US corn crop since 1988. So another totally incorrect prediction from Hansen, of more frequent severe droughts.
I’d like to see the calculations on that 1% probability of error. So scientific! Sounds like Jimmy is an “Occupier”. He’s in the 99 percent.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.