‘
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- CO?²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
When that article came out in June 1988, there was a bad drought in progress over much of the US that resulted in a major (over 20%) reduction of the corn crop. There has been nowhere near such a reduction in the US corn crop since 1988. So another totally incorrect prediction from Hansen, of more frequent severe droughts.
I’d like to see the calculations on that 1% probability of error. So scientific! Sounds like Jimmy is an “Occupier”. He’s in the 99 percent.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.