http://www.350.org/sites/all/files/science-factsheet-updated2011.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
Do note that he said “no ice” and not “ice free”. CAGW believers have claimed that “ice free” means ~10^6 km^2 of ice, but as far as I’m concerned “no ice” means 0 and almost has to be definition.
-Scott
40% decrease? I checked NORSEX ice extent data and did a quick calculation comparing summer min with winter max and did get a low point of 40% of the total extent. I think the part they forgot to mention was that it’s probably been dropping every summer by 40% (give or take a few %) and then back up to 100% in winter, since, oh I don’t know, the last interglacial? An honestly introduced confusion, I’m sure.