http://www.350.org/sites/all/files/science-factsheet-updated2011.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- CO?²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on CO?²
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
Do note that he said “no ice” and not “ice free”. CAGW believers have claimed that “ice free” means ~10^6 km^2 of ice, but as far as I’m concerned “no ice” means 0 and almost has to be definition.
-Scott
40% decrease? I checked NORSEX ice extent data and did a quick calculation comparing summer min with winter max and did get a low point of 40% of the total extent. I think the part they forgot to mention was that it’s probably been dropping every summer by 40% (give or take a few %) and then back up to 100% in winter, since, oh I don’t know, the last interglacial? An honestly introduced confusion, I’m sure.