Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
🙂 who says history does’nt repeat?
There was no Dust Bowl according to the UCS. According to them drought, precipitation and floods have never been worse and that it’s a sure sign that man has caused extreme weather. This is what they claim in their latest graphic on extreme weather. Hidden in the “how we arrived at our graphic” that most people would never bother to read is a caveat that their analysis is based only on weather after 1950. The use of a limited amount of data, and the elimination of data that indicates past weather events that are more extreme than today, seems to be good enough science for the UCS who claims that this limited evidence is enough to tie extreme weather to man. Isn’t post-modern science wonderful? Remember when science was troublesome in that you were expected consider all data? Now with post-modern science wecan just pretend that past data doesn’t exist and voila we get the results we need to fit our agenda. 🙂
http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/chart-science-extreme-weather