Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Shock News : “FIRE and drought is threatening to create a new dust bowl in the US”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
🙂 who says history does’nt repeat?
There was no Dust Bowl according to the UCS. According to them drought, precipitation and floods have never been worse and that it’s a sure sign that man has caused extreme weather. This is what they claim in their latest graphic on extreme weather. Hidden in the “how we arrived at our graphic” that most people would never bother to read is a caveat that their analysis is based only on weather after 1950. The use of a limited amount of data, and the elimination of data that indicates past weather events that are more extreme than today, seems to be good enough science for the UCS who claims that this limited evidence is enough to tie extreme weather to man. Isn’t post-modern science wonderful? Remember when science was troublesome in that you were expected consider all data? Now with post-modern science wecan just pretend that past data doesn’t exist and voila we get the results we need to fit our agenda. 🙂
http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/chart-science-extreme-weather