Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Reid on UK Officially Sucks
- Billyjack on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
A Disturbing Trend In Atmospheric CO2
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
LMAO … I’m sure your hilarious sense of humor will be lost on the alarmists. The adjustment of the graph’s scale to reflect the big picture is poignant.
I detect a thickening (doubling?) of pixels near the terminus of the plot…the end is near!
For a little dab of trace gas, CO2 goes a long, long way!
Always remember; it’s the beer gas!
Cool graph Steve. Made me chuckle. Climate alarmist statisticians use mind stretching voodoo tactics to meet the ‘Agenda’. These also make me chuckle.
OMG, CO2 levels are accelerating at an unprecedented rate!! /sarc
Why did the data get so noisy after 1950 (don’t tell me, they used tree-ring proxies after that, right)?
Is it at .04 % yet?
I’m a climate alarmist statistician and I found this hilarious