Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
LMAO … I’m sure your hilarious sense of humor will be lost on the alarmists. The adjustment of the graph’s scale to reflect the big picture is poignant.
I detect a thickening (doubling?) of pixels near the terminus of the plot…the end is near!
For a little dab of trace gas, CO2 goes a long, long way!
Always remember; it’s the beer gas!
Cool graph Steve. Made me chuckle. Climate alarmist statisticians use mind stretching voodoo tactics to meet the ‘Agenda’. These also make me chuckle.
OMG, CO2 levels are accelerating at an unprecedented rate!! /sarc
Why did the data get so noisy after 1950 (don’t tell me, they used tree-ring proxies after that, right)?
Is it at .04 % yet?
I’m a climate alarmist statistician and I found this hilarious