Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
Hansen 1988 : Earth To Be Red Hot This Decade
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Hansen et al show their complete lack of scientific understanding in the very first sentence of the Introduction to this paper.
It seems they actually believe constructing a 3D computer model is an “experiment”.
Any fool knows an experiment is an event in which data is collected, measured and analysed and THEN compared to theory.
These guys have it backwards – they have a model pre-programmed to produce data which they have no evidence for other than their model and claim the fake “data” verifies the model that produced it !
Lovely example of circular logic – how come Academia isn’t rolling about on the floor laughing over this type of “experiment” ??
A primary school child would fail any basic school course using that approach !
I’d hate to be flying in a plane these guys designed and verified !
Models are tools, like a shovel. You would never see and archeologist pointing at his trowel as “proof” of anything.
“an” archeologist…
“archeaologist”!
Damn I need a beer.
“archaeologist”!!!
Oh Hell, A guy who digs up old stuff.
Gator, I think you could settle for and anthropologist, that’d be easier, a physical one, an I think they use trowels too.
In the excellent book “The Crucible of Time” by James Brunner, the population used “pastudier” as the more sophisticated term was too difficult to manage.
And that wasn’t in American English, where the word has more than one acceptable spelling.
With our catastrophist friends, it is the scientific method that is challenging, leaving them to make predictions from models instead. The auto-correction mechanism — the one that should have said, “after thirty years of failed predictions, we might be doing something wrong,” seems to have been disabled.
Ah, but there’s a good reason for that. This comic strip from years ago seems exactly on point:
http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff600/fv00526.htm
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Hey Keith! Nice one, had not seen that. This hangs in my office…
http://casadelogo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834530d9f69e2011570c2bcbc970b-800wi
Not too bad… He is only out by somewhere between 50 and 300 percent. In climate science that’s the equivalent of a hole in one.
The map is a classic it just goes to show Climate Charlatan Hansen appeared to know very little about weather/climate of the 2 Hemispheres. When its summer in the NH, its Winter in the SH. When its Winter in the NH its Summer in the SH. When its in Spring in the NH its Autumn/Fall in SH. The opposite is always happening. đŸ™‚