Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- mwhite on 100% Wind By 2030
- dearieme on 100% Wind By 2030
- DABA13 on 100% Wind By 2030
- Gamecock on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Hansen 1988 : Earth To Be Red Hot This Decade
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Hansen et al show their complete lack of scientific understanding in the very first sentence of the Introduction to this paper.
It seems they actually believe constructing a 3D computer model is an “experiment”.
Any fool knows an experiment is an event in which data is collected, measured and analysed and THEN compared to theory.
These guys have it backwards – they have a model pre-programmed to produce data which they have no evidence for other than their model and claim the fake “data” verifies the model that produced it !
Lovely example of circular logic – how come Academia isn’t rolling about on the floor laughing over this type of “experiment” ??
A primary school child would fail any basic school course using that approach !
I’d hate to be flying in a plane these guys designed and verified !
Models are tools, like a shovel. You would never see and archeologist pointing at his trowel as “proof” of anything.
“an” archeologist…
“archeaologist”!
Damn I need a beer.
“archaeologist”!!!
Oh Hell, A guy who digs up old stuff.
Gator, I think you could settle for and anthropologist, that’d be easier, a physical one, an I think they use trowels too.
In the excellent book “The Crucible of Time” by James Brunner, the population used “pastudier” as the more sophisticated term was too difficult to manage.
And that wasn’t in American English, where the word has more than one acceptable spelling.
With our catastrophist friends, it is the scientific method that is challenging, leaving them to make predictions from models instead. The auto-correction mechanism — the one that should have said, “after thirty years of failed predictions, we might be doing something wrong,” seems to have been disabled.
Ah, but there’s a good reason for that. This comic strip from years ago seems exactly on point:
http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff600/fv00526.htm
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Hey Keith! Nice one, had not seen that. This hangs in my office…
http://casadelogo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834530d9f69e2011570c2bcbc970b-800wi
Not too bad… He is only out by somewhere between 50 and 300 percent. In climate science that’s the equivalent of a hole in one.
The map is a classic it just goes to show Climate Charlatan Hansen appeared to know very little about weather/climate of the 2 Hemispheres. When its summer in the NH, its Winter in the SH. When its Winter in the NH its Summer in the SH. When its in Spring in the NH its Autumn/Fall in SH. The opposite is always happening. 🙂