Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Mike Peinsipp on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Mike Peinsipp on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Robertvd on El Nino To The Rescue?
- arn on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue?
Hansen 1988 : Earth To Be Red Hot This Decade
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Hansen et al show their complete lack of scientific understanding in the very first sentence of the Introduction to this paper.
It seems they actually believe constructing a 3D computer model is an “experiment”.
Any fool knows an experiment is an event in which data is collected, measured and analysed and THEN compared to theory.
These guys have it backwards – they have a model pre-programmed to produce data which they have no evidence for other than their model and claim the fake “data” verifies the model that produced it !
Lovely example of circular logic – how come Academia isn’t rolling about on the floor laughing over this type of “experiment” ??
A primary school child would fail any basic school course using that approach !
I’d hate to be flying in a plane these guys designed and verified !
Models are tools, like a shovel. You would never see and archeologist pointing at his trowel as “proof” of anything.
“an” archeologist…
“archeaologist”!
Damn I need a beer.
“archaeologist”!!!
Oh Hell, A guy who digs up old stuff.
Gator, I think you could settle for and anthropologist, that’d be easier, a physical one, an I think they use trowels too.
In the excellent book “The Crucible of Time” by James Brunner, the population used “pastudier” as the more sophisticated term was too difficult to manage.
And that wasn’t in American English, where the word has more than one acceptable spelling.
With our catastrophist friends, it is the scientific method that is challenging, leaving them to make predictions from models instead. The auto-correction mechanism — the one that should have said, “after thirty years of failed predictions, we might be doing something wrong,” seems to have been disabled.
Ah, but there’s a good reason for that. This comic strip from years ago seems exactly on point:
http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff600/fv00526.htm
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Hey Keith! Nice one, had not seen that. This hangs in my office…
http://casadelogo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834530d9f69e2011570c2bcbc970b-800wi
Not too bad… He is only out by somewhere between 50 and 300 percent. In climate science that’s the equivalent of a hole in one.
The map is a classic it just goes to show Climate Charlatan Hansen appeared to know very little about weather/climate of the 2 Hemispheres. When its summer in the NH, its Winter in the SH. When its Winter in the NH its Summer in the SH. When its in Spring in the NH its Autumn/Fall in SH. The opposite is always happening. 🙂