Climate morons are busy today claiming that 400 PPM CO2 will destroy the human race. The numbers indicate something completely different.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
- William Capron on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on “a persistent concern”
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- arn on “a persistent concern”
- Margaret Smith on “a persistent concern”
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on 622 billion tons of new ice
If you hate humans like the green lizard people do, that’s bad news.
I bet the mortality tracks about the same.
“During the 20th century, an enormous improvement in public health led to an overall decrease in death rates. Infant mortality rates and maternal mortality rates have dramatically decreased. In the early 1900s, 6-9 women died in pregnancy-related complications for every 1000 births, while 100 infants died before they were 1 year old. In 1999, at the end of the century, the infant mortality rate in the United States declined more than 90% to 7.2 deaths per 1000 live births. Similarly, maternal mortality rates declined almost 99% to less than 0.1 reported deaths per 1000 live births.”
Try again?
Don’t forget that the “7 billion people” is only a guess based on a model too, I spent a year studying up on human population, I wrote complex programs to simulate population growth rates, I also found a lot BS with the estimates from many countries. In my opinion there is a fluctuation of about 5 billion people on earth.
Scenario A. 7 billion people.
Scenario B. 6 billion people.
Scenario C. 5 billion people.
Scenario D. 4 billion people.
Not that 7 or 8 billion people would matter much, I think it would be beneficial, I hope one day human population will reach an optimal of between 10 and 15 billion to the model equivalent, It would be a great human achievement, but unfortunately official models show that human population growth is slowing and will decline.
400 PPM, gasp, trying to get my breath, the light is going dim. cough cough……..see you on the other side…..
Marc Morano linked to you: http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/05/31/submitted-written-testimony-of-climate-depots-marc-morano-at-congressional-hearing-on-climate-change-the-origins-and-response-to-climate-change/