Climate morons are busy today claiming that 400 PPM CO2 will destroy the human race. The numbers indicate something completely different.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Mike Peinsipp on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Mike Peinsipp on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Robertvd on El Nino To The Rescue?
- arn on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue?
If you hate humans like the green lizard people do, that’s bad news.
I bet the mortality tracks about the same.
“During the 20th century, an enormous improvement in public health led to an overall decrease in death rates. Infant mortality rates and maternal mortality rates have dramatically decreased. In the early 1900s, 6-9 women died in pregnancy-related complications for every 1000 births, while 100 infants died before they were 1 year old. In 1999, at the end of the century, the infant mortality rate in the United States declined more than 90% to 7.2 deaths per 1000 live births. Similarly, maternal mortality rates declined almost 99% to less than 0.1 reported deaths per 1000 live births.”
Try again?
Don’t forget that the “7 billion people” is only a guess based on a model too, I spent a year studying up on human population, I wrote complex programs to simulate population growth rates, I also found a lot BS with the estimates from many countries. In my opinion there is a fluctuation of about 5 billion people on earth.
Scenario A. 7 billion people.
Scenario B. 6 billion people.
Scenario C. 5 billion people.
Scenario D. 4 billion people.
Not that 7 or 8 billion people would matter much, I think it would be beneficial, I hope one day human population will reach an optimal of between 10 and 15 billion to the model equivalent, It would be a great human achievement, but unfortunately official models show that human population growth is slowing and will decline.
400 PPM, gasp, trying to get my breath, the light is going dim. cough cough……..see you on the other side…..
Marc Morano linked to you: http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/05/31/submitted-written-testimony-of-climate-depots-marc-morano-at-congressional-hearing-on-climate-change-the-origins-and-response-to-climate-change/