Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on “Why Do You Resist?”
My Response To Scientist Barack Obama
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Maybe the democrats will run the Piltdown Man in 2016.
They did in 2008 and 2012.
See, the Anasazi were responsible for the terrible drought. Man has been destroying his environment for centuries. Anasazi levels of CO2 were huge too. 🙂
Mostly methane from pinto beans.
Richard Betts of the MET Office corrected Obama and told him there was no use of the term “dangerous” Cook’s paper. Obama making stuff up in his tweets too. lol
How would he know? Apparently no one tells him anything.
Well the 77 ot of 10000 lower level folks did.
Prepare to be audited by the IRS, who will demand you provide your donor list of Kochs and Exxon execs. Plus, they’ll want to confiscate all your guns before the CIA shows up at 1 am.
As soon as you see a politician or activist appeal to the consensus of expert opinion, as opposed to actual evidence, your bullshit meter should go on high alert.
Climate Change has and always been about big government.
Climate science is the stick to beat the masses and make thim pay up for big society.
No matter what conversation Obama inserts his thoughts into, he is still the most ignorant man in the room.
Wait to see the retraction when someone runs the numbers.
That “97.1%” was out of the percentage of the abstracts expressing a position on AGW, which according to his abstract, was 33.6% (100 – 66.4 that expressed NO position on AGW).
“…We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming…”
The 3%’ers must be the smart ones