Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
- She Hates Her State
- Climate Friendly War
- Office Of Climate Change And Health Equity And Environmental Justice
- “100% Non-Carbon By 2030”
- 1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide
- Mainstream Fascism In Academia
- California Finds A New Way To Drive Businesses Out
- Powerful Climate Mathematics
- NY Times – Cameras Are Racist
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on AI Doublespeak
- Jack the Insider on AI Doublespeak
- Chris on AI Doublespeak
- arn on AI Doublespeak
- Mac on AI Doublespeak
- Gator on Conspiracy Theory!
- Gordon Vigurs on AI Doublespeak
- Disillusioned on Net Zero Intelligence
- Disillusioned on “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- jb on Net Zero Intelligence
My Response To Scientist Barack Obama
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Maybe the democrats will run the Piltdown Man in 2016.
They did in 2008 and 2012.
See, the Anasazi were responsible for the terrible drought. Man has been destroying his environment for centuries. Anasazi levels of CO2 were huge too. 🙂
Mostly methane from pinto beans.
Richard Betts of the MET Office corrected Obama and told him there was no use of the term “dangerous” Cook’s paper. Obama making stuff up in his tweets too. lol
How would he know? Apparently no one tells him anything.
Well the 77 ot of 10000 lower level folks did.
Prepare to be audited by the IRS, who will demand you provide your donor list of Kochs and Exxon execs. Plus, they’ll want to confiscate all your guns before the CIA shows up at 1 am.
As soon as you see a politician or activist appeal to the consensus of expert opinion, as opposed to actual evidence, your bullshit meter should go on high alert.
Climate Change has and always been about big government.
Climate science is the stick to beat the masses and make thim pay up for big society.
No matter what conversation Obama inserts his thoughts into, he is still the most ignorant man in the room.
Wait to see the retraction when someone runs the numbers.
That “97.1%” was out of the percentage of the abstracts expressing a position on AGW, which according to his abstract, was 33.6% (100 – 66.4 that expressed NO position on AGW).
“…We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming…”
The 3%’ers must be the smart ones