Arctic ice area is normal, and NSIDC has to publish their sea ice news in a couple of days. What bad news can he find to keep the death spiral alive?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
just contemplating Apple’s response if that red line just starts heading straight across the page (without a dip in the summer). he would still deny the data and prattle on about red states.
it doesn’t matter to these marxists, the data will soon be ignored. its all about winning the debate and trying to control as much as our lives as they can
“What bad news can he find to keep the death spiral alive?”
Change the meaningless mean to 1979-1980?
They could also “adjust” the data to correspond with the OBVIOUS WARMING that is taking place – just ask Saint Gore, Saint Mann, Saint McFibben, Saint Hansen.
The bad news will be the unexpected ‘failure’ of the ice thickness measurement hardware, leading to the use of dead-certain models to estimate that the Arctic sea ice is only a few inches thick.
More ice now than in 1990.
http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=05&fd=27&fy=1990&sm=05&sd=27&sy=2013
Why isn’t that graph front-page news? (Yes, I know why, all of our “authoritative” institutions are suborned, the system is broken, and the situation is insane because no one will admit this in public.)
Ah, yes, but, it’s very thin & completely rotten and…….. move along, nothing to see, oooh look a Polar Bear swimming!
Ice volume.