Can Obama Restore The Safe Climate Of 1896?

2 Responses to Can Obama Restore The Safe Climate Of 1896?

1. tckev says:

   June 27, 2013 at 4:07 pm

   “But, but, but we can’t define our climate change by mere anecdotal reportage.” Smuggly squealed the self-important Weather Denier, “We have to base government policy on clear scientific fact and measurement.” he blustered in his gratingly high pitched voice.
   “OK” said the kindly old man. “You go ahead, try.”
   “Well firstly,” shrilled the Weather Denier, “all the climate measurement can only be made by our authorized weather stations,” barely stopping for breath he screeched on “Next, only we on behalf of the IPCC and members of Professional Rationalist with advanced degrees in Climate Knowledge can see and process the data”
   There was something about the way this Weather Denier said ‘process’ that the old man found deeply irritating.
   “Process?” enquired the old man calmly.
   “Yes” screetched the Weather Denier “we process!.” And for the first time looked down at the old man through his half moon spectacles.
   “You process” repeated the old man calmly, then after a pause asked “What, you process?”
   “Data” snapped the Weather Denier, irritated at the impertinence of the old man asking him, a fully Professional Rationalist trainined in Climate Knowledge, such a stupid question.
   “Well that obvious,” the old man cooly replied, “That’s just them figures and the like. But what is this here process?”
   “Process!, Process” screeched the Weather Denier, even more annoyed,”We adjust, or manipulate the data, or the figures.” and the old man realized by the jerky uncoordinated movements of the Weather Denier, that he was about to leave.
   “Hold-on a minute, before you leave could you explain it again, just so I got it straight.”
   “Look I am an official IPCC ‘Professional Rationalist in Climate Knowledge’ and I offically process climate data all day” flounced the Weather Denier in his haughtiest and most pompus squeal.
   “‘S’pose you paid well for that then.” ask the old man dryly.
   “Well enough!” yelped the Weather Denier, “What’s it to you? I’m a professional!” his squealled.
   “So let me see if I got this correct then,” said the old man, thinking over the information. After a pause he continued with a twickle in his eye “I understand it, you’re an offical overpaid IPCC P.R.iC.K. that manipulates his figures all day.”

   🙂

   Reply
2. Rosco says:

   June 27, 2013 at 10:43 pm

   There’s something wrong with that Australian report that says it is hotter in the sun than in the shade.

   Trenberth et al peer reviewed science tells us that sunlight is freezy cold and GHGs warm us so that report must be wrong !

   Reply