It is statistically almost impossible to be as incompetent as the climate modeling community. Dr Roy Spencer has documented their universal failure.
CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT-5-yr-means1.png (1440×1080)
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
I think that 6 sigma would mean that there is about one chance in 4.5 billion that the models are correct and the descrepancy is just chance.
That is consistent with the Model Output! 😉
The Ancient Gray Lady. All the TRUTH is never fit to print. Says we are at a flat Temp time. All US non Believers use rigged Information. So do not believe us It will go back to rising but they do not know when. Their Hockey stick chart is NOT RIGGED. right. An Obama is a Tea Party supported. More Lies for the Ignorant masses.
Is this what they mean by “consensus”?
Yep, there’s a consensus – they’re bunkum!
Six Sigma is not a strategy that AGW kooks are familiar with. It is by definition opposite in every way from pseudo-Science.
Well they got 1975-1980 about right.