My dear Kepler, I wish that we might laugh at the remarkable stupidity of the common herd.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
Recent Comments
- D. Boss on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Independent on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Ivan G Wainwright on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on An Inconvenient Truth
- DD More on Attacks On Democracy
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Billyjack on An Inconvenient Truth
- arn on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
Consensus is an old sceptical rule of thumb used to decide whether a claim is likely to be true. However, the rule of thumb only works on subjects well understood. If you seek a consensus of opinion from experts on something that is not well understood (the climate in 50 years from now, the economic outlook a few years from now, what mathematical strategy is best to derive a grand unified field theory), then your consensus of expert opinion is generally no more reliable than guessing.
What the weather is going to be like tomorrow!
On which planet?
The experts do not have a consensus of what the weather will be like tomorrow.
Same as today!
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.