My dear Kepler, I wish that we might laugh at the remarkable stupidity of the common herd.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
Consensus is an old sceptical rule of thumb used to decide whether a claim is likely to be true. However, the rule of thumb only works on subjects well understood. If you seek a consensus of opinion from experts on something that is not well understood (the climate in 50 years from now, the economic outlook a few years from now, what mathematical strategy is best to derive a grand unified field theory), then your consensus of expert opinion is generally no more reliable than guessing.
What the weather is going to be like tomorrow!
On which planet?
The experts do not have a consensus of what the weather will be like tomorrow.
Same as today!
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.