COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- Disillusioned on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- John Francis on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
Following the link, one discovers that this is a revised chart. The original chart can be found, “for a time,” at the link. The two charts differ and leave different impressions. What is going on here?
They changed their methodology, but both show that Arctic ice is the highest in years.
Ice evaporates without melting first. Most people have seen an old ice cube tray with shrinking ice cubes that were filled months before.
Climate experts assume lay people are gullible and will think the Arctic ice thinning is from global warming and it’s melting. But it is from lower water vapor due to global cooling, and the Arctic ice evaporates. Same with glaciers, until the next ice age.
See http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/questions/question/1943/
I’m sure you realize that the alarmists don’t see a center “average” line – they’re only tracking the current values against that 2012 line, and as soon as this year’s value goes BELOW that “benchmark”, there will be headline news worldwide.
Might as well make them happy, and start posting the “anomaly” between those two. Otherwise they’ll only call you a denier.
You can also stop, every 250 miles and wait 4 hours for a charge. That should give you lots of time to figure out that even ice in the Arctic melts, stupid.