COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
Following the link, one discovers that this is a revised chart. The original chart can be found, “for a time,” at the link. The two charts differ and leave different impressions. What is going on here?
They changed their methodology, but both show that Arctic ice is the highest in years.
Ice evaporates without melting first. Most people have seen an old ice cube tray with shrinking ice cubes that were filled months before.
Climate experts assume lay people are gullible and will think the Arctic ice thinning is from global warming and it’s melting. But it is from lower water vapor due to global cooling, and the Arctic ice evaporates. Same with glaciers, until the next ice age.
See http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/questions/question/1943/
I’m sure you realize that the alarmists don’t see a center “average” line – they’re only tracking the current values against that 2012 line, and as soon as this year’s value goes BELOW that “benchmark”, there will be headline news worldwide.
Might as well make them happy, and start posting the “anomaly” between those two. Otherwise they’ll only call you a denier.
You can also stop, every 250 miles and wait 4 hours for a charge. That should give you lots of time to figure out that even ice in the Arctic melts, stupid.