Slowest fire year on record, and lots of moisture on the way.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Independent on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on Crime In Washington DC
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
If you click on the link and scroll down, the map showing precipitation as % of normal, its is practically solid red in the west (precip only 25% of normal) outside NM and Colorado. For much of the midwest its only 50% of normal.
And during the second week, the flow of moisture increases. Typical July weather in the southwest.
5-day and now new 7-day “official” predictions of total precipitation accumulation
http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/day1-7.shtml
‘Official’ or otherwise is immaterial, how accurate is all that matters.
Jambon:
NOAA can not predict the weather tomorrow with any accuracy. What makes you think they can get 7 days?
miked,
A casino cannot predict what the next roll of the dice will be. What makes you think they can make money?
TOO:
You are asking the wrong person that question! I KNOW why they can make money. That was part of my job!
TOO:
BTW! understanding NOAA’s activities and capabilities was also part of my job.
The die only have 6 side and hopefully unweighted, therefore the statistics of this scenario is trivial.
With weather not all the variables are known, the ones that are known are affected by other random effects (that can be close coupled, or loose coupled, or uncoupled) some with feedback some without, often it is a combination of all these thing. That is why knowledge of your local climate and past weather always makes for better forecasting, and statistical modeling have such a poor record.
Good point – almost every single day for the past week they come on the radio where I am and say high of 100 degrees and then it turns out to be 93-95. They never get called on their endless string of errors.
I am in the second week of hazardous weather advisories for normal conditions. All they can say is rain is possible and it may be severe! I do not worry about they claim the temperature will be.
It looks to me like you have a lot of rain headed your way early next week.