Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
By 2050 we will all be dead
Stick to astronomy Phil Plait as you keep getting everything wrong about climate as you ignore the objective data choosing dire doomsday projections instead, which isn’t doing science, it’s doing soothsaying prognosticating co2 climate doomsday raptures (such as your imagining fire doomsday scenarios that “may” happen 37 years from now intentionally designed to freak people out but which have no basis based upon the objective empirical observational evidence from Nature).
It’s not Plait actually…it’s Mann. Plait for climate stuff is just another Mann mouthpiece.
I have told warmists time and again that fire is essential for the life cycles of some types of vegetation. Fire is also a ‘cleaner’.
Yeah. Unfortunately Greenie Alarmist types don’t get that one.
Nor do they get get that a fair percentage of forest and bush fires they blame on AGW/CC weren’t caused by it either. Since a fair percentage were caused by human carelessness, stupidity and arson. Not CO2 or warming they blame for all disasters.
Steve,
I thought fire suppression policies resulted in crown fires which are bad, and that regular frequent natural fires cleared out the small trees and underbrush but keep the bigger trees healthy (and with less beetles).
Do the ground fires release the seeds from the cones on the ground, and are the natural fires less intense than the ones that occur when fires have been suppressed? How does fire make them germinate without destroying them?
Lodgepole Pine grows in dense groves in the high country, and requires crown fires to germinate.
Pondersoa Pine grows at lower elevations, and naturally forms stands of large, sparse old growth trees. Crown fires are normally not a part of their ecosystem
http://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/~tswetnam/tws-pdf/swnewmexico.pdf
97% of global warmers are arsonists.
97% of climate scientists desperately want the world to burn.
Off the 19,000 fires, what if any were set by the Union of Concerned Idiots or Global Warming Rapid Response Teams. If they had a motto, it surely would be “creating global warming, one forest fire at a time.”
Dead and dying tress are no match for oxygen rich foliage, so anyone thinking dry and drought types of fires are bad to not understand the physics of hard core forest burners…
Plait is a douche
Phil Plait is a moron.