Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- Allan Shelton on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- DD More on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Disillusioned on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Disillusioned on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
By 2050 we will all be dead
Stick to astronomy Phil Plait as you keep getting everything wrong about climate as you ignore the objective data choosing dire doomsday projections instead, which isn’t doing science, it’s doing soothsaying prognosticating co2 climate doomsday raptures (such as your imagining fire doomsday scenarios that “may” happen 37 years from now intentionally designed to freak people out but which have no basis based upon the objective empirical observational evidence from Nature).
It’s not Plait actually…it’s Mann. Plait for climate stuff is just another Mann mouthpiece.
I have told warmists time and again that fire is essential for the life cycles of some types of vegetation. Fire is also a ‘cleaner’.
Yeah. Unfortunately Greenie Alarmist types don’t get that one.
Nor do they get get that a fair percentage of forest and bush fires they blame on AGW/CC weren’t caused by it either. Since a fair percentage were caused by human carelessness, stupidity and arson. Not CO2 or warming they blame for all disasters.
Steve,
I thought fire suppression policies resulted in crown fires which are bad, and that regular frequent natural fires cleared out the small trees and underbrush but keep the bigger trees healthy (and with less beetles).
Do the ground fires release the seeds from the cones on the ground, and are the natural fires less intense than the ones that occur when fires have been suppressed? How does fire make them germinate without destroying them?
Lodgepole Pine grows in dense groves in the high country, and requires crown fires to germinate.
Pondersoa Pine grows at lower elevations, and naturally forms stands of large, sparse old growth trees. Crown fires are normally not a part of their ecosystem
http://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/~tswetnam/tws-pdf/swnewmexico.pdf
97% of global warmers are arsonists.
97% of climate scientists desperately want the world to burn.
Off the 19,000 fires, what if any were set by the Union of Concerned Idiots or Global Warming Rapid Response Teams. If they had a motto, it surely would be “creating global warming, one forest fire at a time.”
Dead and dying tress are no match for oxygen rich foliage, so anyone thinking dry and drought types of fires are bad to not understand the physics of hard core forest burners…
Plait is a douche
Phil Plait is a moron.