“Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts”
– Richard Feynman
97% of climate experts are completely incompetent.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Did you see this on the editorial pages, saying immigration reform will further dry up the Colorado River basin and aquifers out west?
See http://m.reporternews.com/news/2013/may/31/bonnie-erbe-talk-about-immigration-should-effect/
I am sure some ‘AGW/manmade climate change’ believer help can clear a few issues I have…
1. More than twenty years ago the models predicted a continuing upward trend in global surface temperatures if greenhouse gases emissions were not severely curtailed. Emissions have exceeded our worst expectations so…..
2. In 2000 in both Britain and Germany, it was predicted that children would grow up no knowing what snow was. The decreasing can trend can be found ……
3. Following the massive heat wave in Europe in 2003, it was predicted that would extreme heat waves would become more frequent. This trend is shown….
4. Following Hurricane Katrina, it was predicted that would be an upward trend in these severe storms. The evidence can be found……
5. In 2007 the UNIPCC predicted that climate change could lead to a drop fall in crop yields by up to 50% in some African countries by 2020. The latest evidence to support this prediction consists of…..
6. One of the most visible signs of warming is the disappearing snows of Kilimanjaro. This continuing trend can be found…..
7. One of the most dire predicted consequences of global warming is accelerating sea level rise. The latest data demonstrating this trend can be found at…
8. One of the biggest contributors of sea level rise is melting of the polar ice caps. Velicogna and Wahr 2006 predicted that the contribution to sea level rise from Greenland alone would rise from zero to 7mm per annum between 2002 and 2012. The actual data to support this is to be found……
9. Show that the methods are in the tradition of the greatest scientists like Newton, Pasteur, Einstein and Feynman. Where different, explain why climate science’s methods are superior, or more appropriate.
10. Show how, like in the field of medical science, climate science is advancing and over-turning or modifying previously held views through better quality analysis, and can show how proper controls are being implemented and adhered to in order to prevent any conflicts of interest from, for instance, the same people creating temperature sets who are also the trying to vigorously promote their theories.
From a policy point of view, the UNIPCC in the Summary for Policymakers in 2007 that
Given that it would be totally immoral to impose policy whose consequences are more damaging that the issue it is supposed to alleviate, proposals for the proper implementation and control of policy are to be found ……
I thank http://manicbeancounter.com/2013/05/29/three-positive-ways-to-counter-climate-denial/ for this formulation.
Thanks for the link tckev.
The major point I want to get across is this. If climate science is so clearly superior that 97% of expert scientists believe in it, then claims of consensus are superfluous. Supporters can show the successes of that science, and show how it builds on the great scientific traditions of the past.
And I utterly agree.
And which of these “genius-level” scientists predicted this:
http://earthsky.org/science-wire/elevated-carbon-dioxide-making-arid-regions-greener
Yes but that’s based on real data from physical sources and so must be biased.
Consensus science says that Global Sea Ice is disappearing.
Weird! I’d say it’s increasing (short term) or stable (long term) but maybe I’m a dyslexic chart reader. Of course Laz 2.0 et al would say it is rotten ice and full of holes and will disappear completely by September 2013. Good luck with that hypothesis.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg
I’d like people to define what they mean by “consensus” before they throw the word around. Planet has warmed recently or we’re all going to die? Or something inbetween? Or “whatever it is that the IPCC claims is true.”
The consensus agrees with Hansen.
…and Trenberth.
If Arctic or polar ice is thinning but sea level rise is the same rate as before, then the ice is evaporating due to global cooling. Not melting due to warming. Cooling also explains why the Gulfstream would slow down or stop, as when an ice age happens.