Understanding Why Alarmists Can’t Win The Global Warming Debate

  1. Because they don’t have any facts on their side
  2. Because they are ideologues, driven by emotion rather than intellect
  3. Because crime doesn’t pay

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Understanding Why Alarmists Can’t Win The Global Warming Debate

  1. But it’s not just a debate, it’s a war.

  2. Jimbo says:

    It’s not about global warming. It’s about governments making tax revenues and shutting down the fossil fuel industry.

    • Traitor In Chief says:

      Clarification: It’s about the destruction of Free Markets and forced De-Industrialization.

    • tckev says:

      Clarification: Not shutting down the fossil fuel industry, having the ultimate control on it so the elite can continue unfettered.

  3. Traitor In Chief says:

    Those tweets exchanged with Cullen, Bastardi, and Maue were hysterical, BTW.

  4. Andy Oz says:

    Alarmists can make it illegal to challenge their religion. They are getting desperate so I’m not surprised by any move they make.

  5. Bruce says:

    4. You can’t fool all of the people all of the time.

  6. There Is No Substitute for Victory says:

    5. That doesn’t mean that you can’t try

  7. Ben says:

    6. Because the rules were never defined. Define win.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *