Climate experts tell us that climate change has accelerated, because they are criminal psychopaths.
Junk Science Week: Epic climate model failure | FP Comment | Financial Post
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
- She Hates Her State
- Climate Friendly War
- Office Of Climate Change And Health Equity And Environmental Justice
- “100% Non-Carbon By 2030”
- 1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide
- Mainstream Fascism In Academia
- California Finds A New Way To Drive Businesses Out
- Powerful Climate Mathematics
- NY Times – Cameras Are Racist
- Forests Cause Forest Fires
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Michael Peinsipp on “No One Is Above The Law”
- arn on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Laurie on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Gamecock on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Russell Cook on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
My wuwt comment:
“But if it’s colder than normal, that’s proof of warming.”
We know they say that, but just now in this video a UN climate delegate at Bonn says it so explicitly and idiotically that it almost blows your mind. Here the delegate insists that the freezing German summer weather is proof of warming. Insane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_hcz0NwtU7Q
73 models…so if even one model were below the current measured values, the models would still be rejected at a 98.6% confidence interval, assuming they are normally distributed. As it stands, 100% of the 73 are well above observations now, so I wouldn’t be surprised if we can reject the models’ results (for this metric) at a 3-sigma level, or with 99.7% confidence. Even something as “averaged out” and random-walk-like as the average global temperature anomaly is still off by a factor of two.
Graphs like the above one are, IMO, the #1 thing climate skeptics should be pointing to. Really, it’s the only thing that needs pointed to. The most basic of predictions that the entire hypthoses hinges on and they get it totally wrong.
-Scott
Just ask Phil and Gavin! Observations are consistent with model outputs! 😉 😉
The models are right. It’s just that the heat is missing. Or something like that.
Well, yes – the heat is in the oceans – so the planet is STILL warming. Don’t ask the alarmists how the heat gets into the ocean from the atmosphere; just BELIEVE THEM!
Al Gore found it! Apparently CO2 has superheated the Earth’s core…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMrxC-qEHb8
If you start the temps at the same point as the mean…..the discrepancy is even bigger
But…but…but…the Arctic is melting!!!