Arctic Alarmists Trying To Weasel Their Way Out Of Their BS

Polar ice loss cause still unclear

New research shows that glaciologists still cannot say for certain whether the Earth’s north and south polar ice is melting faster

Here is a non-conclusion: after nine years of close observation, researchers still cannot be sure whether the planet is losing its ice caps at an accelerating rate.

In other words, they have been talking out of their asses for the past nine years.

That is because the run of data from one satellite is still not long enough to answer the big question: are Greenland and Antarctica melting because of global warming, or just blowing hot before blowing cold again in some long-term natural cycle?

Polar ice loss cause still unclear | Environment | guardian.co.uk

What they are saying is that Greenland and Antarctica are both cooling, and the formerly hysterical scientists need to find a way to back out of all the BS they have been spreading.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Arctic Alarmists Trying To Weasel Their Way Out Of Their BS

  1. Andy Oz says:

    The Guardian is as bad as Baghdad Bob. They are fighting a losing battle against more and more inconvenient climate facts. Keep spinning baby!

  2. Federico Manchini says:

    Why is this
    http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm
    so different to this?
    http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php
    maybe optical illusion? Maybe Jaxa is paid by the faithfull to melt ice

  3. Jimbo says:

    For years they told us that it was worse than we thought. Now they are not so sure. One thin for sure is that the Arctic is colder than average and Antarctica is expanding and they just don’t know why.

  4. Jimbo says:

    The question is: could this just be the consequence of some natural rhythm so far unidentified?


    They will soon discover the natural climate oscillations PDO, AMO, AO, NAO. Heh, heh. 🙂
    http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/AO_NAO.htm

  5. Steve Keohane says:

    Federico Manchini says:July 16, 2013 at 10:35 am
    Check out Cryosphere Today. They are showing 6.01sq.km. remaining, some 25% lower than what the graphs you posted show. I do not think CT is correct.
    http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.recent.arctic.png

  6. phodges says:

    First Nature, now the Guardian.

    I will revel in rubbing it in believers faces as the scam is slowly dropped 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *