The sea level rise rate at Manhattan has been steady for 150 years, except for 1928-1948, when it rose twice as fast.
Data and Station Information for NEW YORK ( THE BATTERY)
This proves that the earth is doomed by mindless alarmist cherry pickers.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Hank Phillips on “getting smaller”
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
The sea level rise rate at Manhattan has been steady for 150 years, except for 1928-1948, when
it roseManhattan sank twice as fast.Beside glacial isostatic rebound, look how many edifices were built on Manhattan during that time
http://www.aviewoncities.com/nyc/skyscrapers.htm
New York FEMA climate rapid response team in action:
“The sea level is rising and the only guys with an ark are tooling around in the arctic??!! Reggie!! Tell that rowing team to get off their asses and row down to New York and save those poor people. They are all about to drown!!
What’s that? In about 10,000 years?
Right. Right. WTF!
Reggie? Cancel that order.”
if those guys will save the world …
Reblogged this on The Firewall.
The trend line, 1852-2013, looks just like the trend line everyplace else.
This kind of short-term imagining of trends is an illusion. Take a look at 1890-1920. Isn’t that the same kind of “trend”? Now look at 1950-1970. Isn’t that also a “trend”? So now we have three periods within the overall timeline that show trends exceeding the long-term trend. Your point is?
Well you took the bait…… ROFL
You were the one claiming that there was a recent upturn, and now you admit that it is just bullshit..