Several commenters are starting to sound like 13 year olds, with constant gutter insults.
This really doesn’t help anyone out.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
Recent Comments
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on “pushing nature past its limits”
Sorry to paste the test from that link multiple times in the hail thread. I’d looked it up when I saw T.O.O.’s comment this morning about him being able to say for certain that there was no hail in Albuquerque in Santa Fe in the 60’s. That was obvious B.S., so I searched it quick and found the link that he later tried to use as evidence, but I didn’t have time to post it b/c I went to the (rather dinky) 4th parade with my son. Got back, saw the argument was still going on, and pasted that to show him how absurd his claim was…clearly no reading–or no reading comprehension on his part anyway.
I scrolled down and saw that you posted the same text later…so sorry for the repeat info.
-Scott
[T.O.O. says “I am now spam”]
dunno, the math works….
there were 677 hail events in July and August….in 57 years (1955-2012)
11.8 per year in July/Aug
There are ~ 8 weeks in July/Aug = ~1.5 per week
So actually there’s over one per week…..1 1/2
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/abq/?n=prephazards
woops….that was an answer to TOO who said there wasn’t a hail storm every week in July and August
No, you are $#!+
Steve – my last two comments have disappeared. Something weird going on? Suddenly, WordPress is having my enter my name/e-mail again too…never have to do that.
-Scott
Odd, now at least one of them is back? Maybe it’s on my end.
-Scott
Just spam them Steve, if they are not prepared to treat others with respect.
Actually having T.O.O. unreliable,post his baloney exposes the depth of their desperation in trying to deny that weather today is similar to the 1960’s in the hope they can show severe weather events are increasing at an accelerating rate.
I just trying to figure out what all the bedwetting is about….
if a 40% increase in CO2…only got us a half degree,,,,,since the LIA
Lat:
Only since 1950 counts according to the “Experts”! 😉
Must be that time of year again!
I rather enjoy the “warmists” idiots who come here. It simply reinforces our belief that we are right haha.
It appears that I am in moderation for some reason.
Hail is a localized event. Maybe T. O. O. lived in a hailshadow location. Or maybe he just does not remember. Or maybe he has never lived in New Mexico.
Andy:
Multiple choice is tough! 😉
Can we run a model on that to find the BEST answer?