Green shows ice present in 2013 which was not present in 2012. Red shows the opposite.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
Gaia Shrugged and left all the warmista shivering in the cold.
Game Over.
“adjustments” will turn this into a net loss. The Borg will not be denied their crisis.
How thick is all that blue ice?
Less than a millimeter. Depends on what kind of screen you are looking at.
Look at the difference in the proximity of the ice to the Alaskan coast. Somebody has decided not to count an awful lot of ice.
http://iceweb1.cis.ec.gc.ca/Prod20/page3.xhtml
Have not noticed the usual alarmist nutcases posting about Arctic ice extent lately.
I’m not able to track on this, Steve, using the linked source. That data seems to show these numbers for August 13, 2012 and 2013:
5178750 6152500
I make that an increase of 18.8%. Can you point me in the right direction?
Incidentally, I’ve updated the MLF spreadsheet; the crew is “pulling” for a very late October arrival, which seems likely to be a drag … over ice. Still technically possible — it might even be easier. But it’s not exactly a Northwest Passage.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
I’m using their maps and comparing with a higher concentration threshold than their 15% calculations.
I will not be assimilated!