Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
Recent Comments
- Denis Rushworth on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- D. Boss on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Independent on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Ivan G Wainwright on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on An Inconvenient Truth
- DD More on Attacks On Democracy
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Can Heidi Be Taught How To Think Rationally?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
At the end of the Eemian, a forgotten civilisation of v8000 horsepower-driving orangutans caused a sudden spike in temperatures on Earth.
It goes without saying that they were the cause of the last major extinction on the planet, and that the incredibly rich diversity of life which now exists could only have arisen with a steady, constant mean temperature of 14.58693756oC.
Nope, not as long as AGW is the hip trend. Of course, 30 years from now she’ll write about the AGW social phenomenon as if she didn’t have anything to do with it. They’ll also be saying that the AGW craze was “bi-partisan.” They’ll use John McCain as an example. Heck. everbody was just caught up in AGW mania.
Why should anyone believe any of that? (I think that means I agree with Anto above.)
By the way, the “Eemian” was–supposedly–114,000 to 130,000 years ago. A meaningless word to the geologically unbrainwashed, it derived from the river Eem in the Netherlands, where a geologist dug up enough evidence to make the word up and get away with it. Other geologists in other areas of the world dug up other evidence and made up other names for the same supposed period. (According to Wikipedia: “The Eemian is also known as the Sangamonian Stage in North America, the Ipswichian Stage in the UK, the Mikulin interglacial in the East European Plain, the Valdivia interglacial in Chile and the Riss-Würm interglacial in the Alps.”). None of the names have any sure connection to the actual reality of that supposed time period, as we are only talking about a geological model, subject to the same “garbage in, garbage out” limitations as are climate models. (In geology, the “garbage in” is the assumption of unbroken uniformitarianism.)
So the little warm spike at the end of the Eemian was much more catastrophic than our little warm spike at the end of the Holocene?
So anyone with a time machine who travels back to the Eemian could build a few feet above sea level and have nothing to worry about in their lifetime.
So 1.7 feet in 100 years or 5 mm/year?