Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Can Heidi Be Taught How To Think Rationally?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
At the end of the Eemian, a forgotten civilisation of v8000 horsepower-driving orangutans caused a sudden spike in temperatures on Earth.
It goes without saying that they were the cause of the last major extinction on the planet, and that the incredibly rich diversity of life which now exists could only have arisen with a steady, constant mean temperature of 14.58693756oC.
Nope, not as long as AGW is the hip trend. Of course, 30 years from now she’ll write about the AGW social phenomenon as if she didn’t have anything to do with it. They’ll also be saying that the AGW craze was “bi-partisan.” They’ll use John McCain as an example. Heck. everbody was just caught up in AGW mania.
Why should anyone believe any of that? (I think that means I agree with Anto above.)
By the way, the “Eemian” was–supposedly–114,000 to 130,000 years ago. A meaningless word to the geologically unbrainwashed, it derived from the river Eem in the Netherlands, where a geologist dug up enough evidence to make the word up and get away with it. Other geologists in other areas of the world dug up other evidence and made up other names for the same supposed period. (According to Wikipedia: “The Eemian is also known as the Sangamonian Stage in North America, the Ipswichian Stage in the UK, the Mikulin interglacial in the East European Plain, the Valdivia interglacial in Chile and the Riss-Würm interglacial in the Alps.”). None of the names have any sure connection to the actual reality of that supposed time period, as we are only talking about a geological model, subject to the same “garbage in, garbage out” limitations as are climate models. (In geology, the “garbage in” is the assumption of unbroken uniformitarianism.)
So the little warm spike at the end of the Eemian was much more catastrophic than our little warm spike at the end of the Holocene?
So anyone with a time machine who travels back to the Eemian could build a few feet above sea level and have nothing to worry about in their lifetime.
So 1.7 feet in 100 years or 5 mm/year?