Alarmist reader Paul says :
You cannot use data from 2 different methods of collection and draw conclusion
That is exactly what Michael Mann did to create the hockey stick, and exactly what alarmists did to claim that sea level rise has increased.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
Recent Comments
- Luigi on Up Is Down
- Tel on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- dm on The Clean Energy Boom
- arn on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- arn on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on The Clock Is Ticking
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
WOW! You picked up another one. They are always taking the bait you offer. Thanks for the entertainment. 😉
What? No hat tip to the Gator? 😉
…and tree rings
You may have a convert!
Twenty-first century science can be summed up in one word – “could.”
may, might, shoulda, woulda, coulda
…and wanna.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Gosh I thought some guy in Canada designed the hockey stick /smart-assed-grin
Paul; That’s where ‘hide the decline ‘ comes from, plonker.
Paul may have meant “except when the IPCC endorses if”
Ummm, he actually said that the lay people shall not challenge the
scientistspriesthood. Uhuhh.Ocean temperatures as well.
I think they used the same approach to claim that temperatures have never risen in the past at the rate they are rising now (sic). “Unprecedented” is a commonly tossed around word.
I’m finding that ‘unprecedented’ is being used at an unprecedented rate 😉