NASA is constantly cooling the past and warming the present – in order to make it appear that Hansen’s theories aren’t the miserable failure which they actually are.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
- No Crime On Capitol Hill
- Chief Scientist And Religious Leader
- Heroes Saving The Climate
- “15 DAYS TO SLOW THE SPREAD”
- “Gell-Mann Amnesia effect”
- Socialism Couldn’t Save The Glaciers
Recent Comments
- arn on Our New Leadership
- arn on Attacks On Democracy
- Independent on Attacks On Democracy
- Bob G on Attacks On Democracy
- conrad ziefle on Attacks On Democracy
- conrad ziefle on Scientists Warn
- conrad ziefle on Scientists Warn
- Michael L Dee on Our New Leadership
- Peter Carroll on Scientists Warn
- dm on Attacks On Democracy
The new Surtr has spoken. Amen.
I really love this theme “Wrecks our story, Let’s get rid of it”.
This is what characterizes the core of your blog. Staccato type messages like bulets from a machine gun. The “jumping graph’s” leave absolutely no room for any discussion as they represent noting less but “hard forensic evidence” of large scale data manipulation.
IMO there is no better way to reveal the AGW scam because even a six year old can understand what’t going on.
This is the way to wreck the entire “cult” most effectively.
Please proceed. I look forward to the next “deadly” shot from the hip.
You’re a killer.
“IMO there is no better way to reveal the AGW scam because even a six year old can understand what’s going on”
Are Climate Alarmists Smarter Than a Six-Year Old!, now that’s an idea for a show.
I can’t even understand how they are allowed to make adjustments to observations. I can see adjustments to estimations but definitely not actual measurements.
The step-functions look like there were fundamental changes in observing, as when the temperatures were taken, or the type of instrument used, or the location of the weather station.
At 1904/1905: you know what was done?
From 1939 – 1947, the change was progressive, as if multiple stations were being converted over time to a new system. You know what the deal was?
I see many stations in the Arctic where the 1930s were adjusted way down in V3.
Dear Internal Revenue Service,
Herein find my revised figures for my past tax liabilities. The fact that they all tilt in my favour is none of your business. Please remit the total amount of overpayment for previous years as soon as possible.