All life on this planet is based on carbon and dependent on photosynthesis of CO2, but Steven Schneider says that all CO2 must be eliminated.
Schneider, the Stanford scientist, put it bluntly.
“We’re betting the planet,” he said of haggling over emissions targets. “There’s no such thing as a safe level. There’s a level of very risky, versus mildly risky.”
Is 350 the New 450 When It Comes to Capping Carbon Emissions? – NYTimes.com
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUOdJo9F6rk]
I suggest that idiot put some plants in a sealed terrarium and watch them die once all the CO2 has been absorbed by them. What a tool.
He can not! He quit emitting CO2.
So he’s no longer respirating? Brilliant! 😉
He might be practicing the CCS program! he is in the Storage state now!
He might be practicing the CCS program! he is in the Storage state now!
Clip is from ‘Devil in the Dark’. Was the jump cut a look into Kirk’s mind during the conversation?
Didn’t Schneider die of a heart attack in first class on his way to a climate conference?
Yeah, he did pass away a while ago. It was his students that made that pathetic list of 496 scientists not to be believed regarding climate science (Anderlegg et al) sp? The list was published online by the National Academy of sciences. Reprehensible!!!
If you check the July 22, 2013 of Time Magazine, you will see an article entitled the original genius bar; The institute of Advanced Study. Among the nine individuals shown are J. Robert Oppenheimer (Manhattan Project), Albert Einstein, and Freeman Dyson.
Freeman Dyson is third on the Anderlegg list.
People wonder why trust in the science world has been diminished so much.
And was it Schneider in Nimoy’s 1970s Ice Age thriller? There IS a toxic level, however…. Of Lib Twatwaffles. They’re poisoning the planet.
Yes the very same Schneider!
Not credible at all.
He was a walking admitted bullshitting liar. Because, to paraphrase, “for the greater good” it’s desirable to lie, to fabricate fantastic scary bullshit, for no other purpose but to dupe the public so that they can get their carbon restrictions and extravagant windmill subsidies and HUGE amount of research funds.
And after Schneider said this, there was a parade of others, including Al Gore, that said similar things. All explicitly calling for lies. Well, and the leftist Senator Tim Wirth said in 1993: “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing.” That was it, for the scientists and politicians, it didn’t matter at all whether the theory was true because it’s the right thing to do anyway. And the scientists had already been given the green light to lie, because it’s “the right thing” that we are supporting in our lies. This is no conspiracy theory, and I have more quotes here of the warmists explicitly calling for lies, no joke: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/mikey-says-the-goal-of-research-is-to-push-an-agenda/#comment-254784
Now you see so many warmists saying like: “Well, what if we are wrong? Will we have done such a terrible thing by building a better world anyway?”
A better world?
Like the — 83% — CO2 cuts mandated by 2050 that were in the Cap & Trade bill that passed the US House in 2009? 83%, with large cuts coming immediately. This would have taken a wrecking ball to the economy, and created virtually apocalyptic havoc. “A better world,” I’m afraid not.
Thanks to Schneider and Wirth et al, lyingitis has gone through the entire body politic of the warmist scientific and political establishment. They are going to continue to spout the most outlandish fabricated “scary scenarios,” every day it’s another horrifying fear mongering prognostication of doom, often shamelessly targeting children. It’s despicable. But they can justify it in the end, because they think even if it’s all bogus bs that we will be “building a better world anyway.” Obama’s current Science Czar said way back in 1973 that he wished for “a massive campaign .. to de-develop the United States.” That’s what the 83% CO2 cuts would deliver to them on a silver platter. No, it wouldn’t be a better world, there would be death and misery beyond compare. (And lol on the Star Trek video! Yes, it’s carbon based life, so let’s attack carbon as evil.)
Steven, if possible, could you delete this and the above comment, because obviously I messed up on an italics tag, and I resubmitted it below. Otherwise, ok. Sorry for that. My huge bad!
Not credible at all.
He was a walking admitted bullshitting liar. Because, to paraphrase, “for the greater good” it is desirable to lie, to fabricate fantastic scary bullshit, for no other purpose but to dupe the public so that they can get their carbon restrictions and extravagant windmill subsidies and HUGE amount of research funds.
And after Schneider said this, there was a parade of others, including Al Gore, that said similar things. All explicitly calling for lies. Well, and the leftist Senator Tim Wirth said in 1993: “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing.” That was it, for the scientists and politicians, it didn’t matter at all whether the theory was true because it’s the right thing to do anyway. And the scientists had already been given the green light to lie, because it’s “the right thing” that we are supporting in our lies. This is no conspiracy theory, and I have more quotes here of the warmists explicitly calling for lies, no joke: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/mikey-says-the-goal-of-research-is-to-push-an-agenda/#comment-254784
Now you see so many warmists saying like: “Well, what if we are wrong? Will we have done such a terrible thing by building a better world anyway?”
A better world?
Like the — 83% — CO2 cuts mandated by 2050 that were in the Cap & Trade bill that passed the US House in 2009? 83%, with large cuts coming immediately. This would have taken a wrecking ball to the economy, and created virtually apocalyptic havoc. “A better world,” I’m afraid not.
Thanks to Schneider and Wirth et al, lyingitis has gone through the entire body politic of the warmist scientific and political establishment. They are going to continue to spout the most outlandish fabricated “scary scenarios,” every day it is another horrifying fear mongering prognostication of doom, often shamelessly targeting children. It’s despicable. But they can justify it in the end, because they think even if it’s all bogus bs that we will be “building a better world anyway.” Obama’s current Science Czar said way back in 1973 that he wished for “a massive campaign .. to de-develop the United States.” That’s what the 83% CO2 cuts would deliver to them on a silver platter. No, it wouldn’t be a better world, there would be death and misery beyond compare. (And lol on the Star Trek video! Yes, it’s carbon based life, so let’s attack carbon as evil.)
Schneider spent his entire career predicting environmental Armageddon. Sadly, before he died, not one of his prophesies came to pass.
Will, I am sure that you meant instead of sadly, but predictably and sadly for him
He was also the puppet master of Al Gore.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsRVy3BYu1M