Sometimes when you are saving the planet, you just have to knock 2.1° C off of the 1940 temperature.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Gordon Vigurs on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Ed on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Walter on Ellen Flees To The UK
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- conrad ziefle on Ellen Flees To The UK
And they are still unable to explain the blip. The same lack of knowledge prevents accurate climate modelling.
Thanks for the reminder. Not that I forgot, but just like commercial advertising it helps to see the message more than once.
Keep hammering away. The battering ram doesn’t break through on the first bump.
Until climate scientists can deal with the PDO, make proper adjustments for UHI and get rid of unjustified adjustments, they will continue to be judged as alarmists prostituting themselves for research dollars and not true science.
Don’t forget solar and earth core heat variations.
Can’t just say they don’t matter because you haven’t figured out how the might be important.
The=they.
You display your research in such fascinating graphics. Only a “tripped-out” (on kool-aid) fanatical Warmist could DENY the blatant “tampering”.
Steve,
O/T and FYI
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/come-shoot-me-s.html#comments
Just for reference: What are the dates for the sources of the first and second graphs in the animation?
GISS V2 vs. V3
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=620040300000&dt=1&ds=1
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=620040300000&dt=1&ds=14
Thanks. This led me to this WUWT article:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/26/nasa-giss-caught-changing-past-data-again-violates-data-quality-act/
For those who are curious: v3 was apparently released in November 2011.
Let’s face it, despite all the BS that is being spouted, there very little understanding of climate-past, present or future. At best it is all speculation.
But I bet you would agree that the range of temperatures from the past has been great enough to dispel any notion that massive out-of- control feedbacks will ever occur.